Sun. Oct 2nd, 2022

Harare — Russia provides about 25% of the oil that Europe needs and 45% of its gas imports, according to experts writing for African Arguments. The conflict has highlighted the vulnerability of national security in the energy dependent countries. While there is much speculation about what the invasion means for the global political order, it also highlights the importance of a transition to more sustainable forms of energy.

The Centre for Sustainability Transitions (CST) and The South African Institute of International Affairs (SAIIA) have launched a series of webinars focusing on the implications of the invasion for the African continent. In their latest webinar titled, The Future of Energy: Can the war support the transition towards fossil fuel alternatives?” hosts, Professor Mark Swilling, Co-director of the Centre for Sustainability Transitions at the Stellenbosch University and Dr Olena Pavlenko, a Deputy Head of the EITI MSG in Ukraine and President of DiXi Group Think Tank weighed in on how this war could impact the transition away from fossil fuels amid the climate emergency and whether it will hasten the transition or not.

Following the invasion, oil and gas prices rose rapidly, which has increased the likelihood of gas-to-coal switching for electricity generation across Europe and the world, according to a report by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

Germany has already decided to use coal, again, for what they say will be a short period of time, because of risks to national security, and to be ready for winter, says Dr. Olena Pavlenko Polanco. This is despite many countries including Germany having pledged to reduce their reliance on coal power before the invasion.

Carbon emissions from coal hit historical highs in 2021, the International Energy Agency said in an annual emissions report released in March 2022.

Coal, according to the report, accounted for over 40% of the overall growth in global carbon dioxide emissions in 2021, reaching an all-time high of 15.3 billion tonnes adding that carbon dioxide emissions from natural gas rebounded well above their 2019 levels to 7.5 billion tonnes.

Coal is a major contributor to climate change and the war has made it more difficult to phase out as it is relatively cheap and widely available.

The UN says coal, oil and gas – are by far the largest contributor to global climate change, accounting for over 75% of global greenhouse gas emissions and nearly 90% of all carbon dioxide emissions. As greenhouse gas emissions blanket the Earth, they trap the sun’s heat.

This clearly shows that in the short term, the war has had a negative impact on the immediate goal of reducing carbon emissions.

In the long-run, Germany aims to be 100% renewable by 2035, the net zero by 2045, Professor Mark Swilling said.

This is how they’ll do it.

The plan, according to Swilling, includes 22 gigawatts of solar per annum, starting in 2026. And 10 gigawatts of onshore wind per annum, starting in 2025, making 32 gigawatts per annum of new renewables through 2035. The extremely ambitious project was triggered by the current European crisis caused by the conflict.

Dr. Olena Pavlenko Polanco, an energy expert who has worked on strengthening the energy sector governance and improving policy and transparency, says Ukraine was doing well before the war.

“We were developing our National Energy and Climate Plan. So even now actually with the reconstruction plan of Ukraine, which was presented in Lugano in July, we still keep these promises on decarbonisation and more development of renewables. So we want to use the the reconstruction or rebuilding process, actually not to rebuild what was there before but to modernise our energy sector during the process of rebuilding,” she said.

But if the war in Ukraine has exposed the danger of being too dependent on commodities from one country, in this case, Russia, how would this be avoided in the future? How does the world avoid a swap from one dependency for another since a monopoly on clean energy would cause an opportunity for manipulation.

This is where the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) comes in, says Polanco.

EITI is a global standard which is implemented in more than 50 countries. Governments and companies publicly report how much taxes they pay to different different levels, local budgets, state budgets, special funds on an annual basis.

Since 2011 according to Polanco, the EITI has built a sort of trust between extractive companies, energy companies and governments in Ukraine.

For Africa, the most visible impact of the war has also been the rising fuel and food prices, inflation and financial instability.

The poorest countries are hardest hit as a large proportion of their consumption expenditure is on food and transport.

In July 2022, while addressing South Africans on the energy crisis, President Cyril Ramaphosa said one of the first steps his administration took to address the electricity shortfall was to revive the renewable energy procurement programme in 2018.

Since then, over 2,000 MW of solar and wind power has been connected to the grid through Bid Window 4 of the programme.

A further 2,600 MW of capacity has been procured through Bid Window 5, which will begin to add capacity from early 2024, Ramaphosa said, adding that the government had already started to diversify generation by allowing parties other than Eskom to generate electricity.

While the war may have provided a short term set back to global climate goals, it is likely that in the long run it will accelerate the energy transition. If companies and nations are incentivised to adopt of a range of lower carbon energy sources, the transition would happen faster, said Polanko. The question is whether such a shift can happen rapidly enough to allow the world to meet its climate action goals.

There has been a substantial increase in coal exports to Europe between January and May 2022, according to Swilling. “It’s a 40% increase. If you look at the graphs of the increase in exports to Europe, it’s absolutely stunning, actually. I mean, countries like Spain, Poland, Germany are importing coal from South Africa from zero, they did not import anything. France has increased from 74 to 511 tonnes,” he said.

We can’t afford making that a norm if we are going to avoid the worst impacts of the climate crisis. One major setback has been how the combination of the Covid-19 pandemic and the conflict has disrupted supply chains which has resulted in a rise in shipping prices. Swilling says there has been a 40% increase in prices of renewable energy equipment that South Africa imports.